Friday, March 13, 2009
woodstock
Activism In the White House: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-10194174-38.html
First link is article
http://abcnews.go.com/Entertainment/Television/WireStory?id=7071736&page=2
Second Link is the show, and the show you want is titled
Intro - Brawl Street: Get Ready to Buy Low! And Sell Die
http://www.thedailyshow.com/How To Become A Professional Media Activist: http://www.fair.org/index.php?page=119

Also, I used some articles in my paper from FAIR (Fairness and Accuracy In Report). I really enjoyed there site, and especially thought it was funny and interesting that the organization actually has an entire section of there sight on educating everyone with a "FAIR'S MEDIA ACTIVIST KIT", it literally goes step by step of how to detec bias, communicate, etc. At first I thought there were using this as a joke, but after reading each topic it was loaded interesting stuff.
http://www.banksy.co.uk/
I hope all your papers went well. As you know I did my paper on Shepard Fairey and I just wanted to share some extra information about him. The first link I am posting is to Underwire magazine, and it gives a little background on Shepard as well as some really great images of his art work. The second link, is to an article that discusses Shepard venting about copiers of his work. Make sure you check out the comments/blogs fallowing the article. It is really intersting to read about how much conterversy surrounds Shepard and get the full specturm of opniouns form his audeince.
http://blog.wired.com/underwire/2008/09/poster-boy-shep.html
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/washington/2008/10/shepard-fairy-o.html
http://seattle.indymedia.org/en/1999/12/328.shtml


Hey everyone, now that the papers are over, I wanted to give everyone the link to one of the blog's from Seattle Indy Media, that I used in my paper. I really think that this blog segment really gives you an idea how of diverese alternative media can be. I really could never imagine a mainstream source going this far. Check it Out...
Monday, March 9, 2009
Whats A? Subvertisment
Leprechaun in Mobile, Alabama
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Culture Jamming
Here are some of the links I showed in class. I'm also including a couple I didn't show which deal with Detournment and subversive cartography... contemporary movements which may have been inspired from the Situationists/Guy Debord. These are also classified as Psychogeography. Basically these movements fit into Culture Jamming because they are questioning authority, authenticity and herd mentality regarding how we respond to our surroundings. Can we rely on a map to define our experience of a place? Why not create our own maps, our own realities based on personal experiences, our imagination and a hyper attention to our surroundings?
On the "Institute for Infinitely Small Things" website (the collective which publicly performs corporate commands), check out their projects, including the "unmarked package" video. This is a performance where the artists marched around Chicago with a pile of mysterious, unmarked packages and interviewed people on their views regarding fear and security. It's an interesting project.
Institute for Infinitely Small Things - Corporate Commands
http://www.ikatun.org/institute/infinitelysmallthings/corporatecommands/about.php
The Good Consumer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A_ut93YYZu8
The Bubble Project
http://thebubbleproject.com/a>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7GCsrX5K_o&feature=channel_page
Whirlmart - Buy Nothing Day
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JajJCcUUVgk
Subversive Cartography - Situationists - Psychogeography
http://www.virtualmuseum.ca/Exhibitions/Photos/html/en/sm-essay.html
Subversive Cartography - Urban Interventionism - tweaking how a neighborhood is portrayed on google maps
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sIDGyRO6w2o
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
The Boondocks
Counter-hegemony occurs within a system, an attempt to challenge dominant ideological frameworks. The second season of the Boondocks television show had two episodes that were banned from distribution. The two episodes were a critique on Black Entertainment Television, which throughout its existence, the comic has constantly mocked. The banned episodes created a buzz on the internet, because their existence was not yet verified until a hip hop blog created a new post streaming the show.
At this point, the Boondocks had a mass following. The show itself had begun to steer more towards comedy for comedy’s sake, rather than its original political and social satirical commentary. It returned to its early roots in episodes challenging BET and black popular culture in an easily digestible form. One episode showed a hunger strike by the 10-year-old main character, the other, a ridiculous reality show trailing a self hating black man. The shows creator claimed he wrote these shows because BET has not changed, it is still an awful representation of black culture.
Link to watch the second banned episode no
http://www.hiphopdx.com/index/videos/id.665/title.boondocks-hunger-strike-banned
Culture Jamming
video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFubqcvkSos
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Another Fine Art Remix: Manet & Brack
While studying abroad in Brisbane, Australia in the fall, I took an Australian Art class where I was introduced to the work of Antipodean painter John Brack (1920-1999). He was born in Melbourne in 1920 and joined the Antipodeans group in the 1950s, protesting against abstract expressionism as a worthless form of art that did not reflect the truth of life.
His most famous work, The Bar (1955), is a remix of the famous A Bar at the Folies-Begere (1882) by Édouard Manet (1832-1883). Compare the two below:

Manet's A Bar at the Folies-Begere, 1882

Brack's The Bar, 1955
Brack used Manet's composition to comment on the six o'clock swill, which was the rush to buy drinks after work before Australian public bars closed between 5 and 6 p.m. in the 1950s. The Bar was a satirical and critical view of Australian suburban life, where the bar often served as a purely functional environment meant as an escape to the drone of 1950s suburban life.
In Manet's painting, the mirror behind the pretty barmaid reflects a lively, joyful atmosphere. She is helping a customer in the reflection, but in our head-on view, she appears idle and pensive, perhaps even bored or jaded.
In Brack's version, the barmaid -- who is angular and rather mannish -- is smiling slyly, not helping any customers. Behind her we can see, reflected in the mirror, a full bar of men methodically throwing back drinks.
The sharp contrast in atmosphere and purpose of the bar is apparent from Manet's view of the 1800s French social bar and Brack's image of the 1950s Australian escape-from-suburbia bar. Brack's use of Manet's work, set in a bustling bar, to comment on the current (for him!) condition of claustrophobic suburbia is apparent.
Just another example of fine art remix...!
Hacktivism
Here is what I'll be showing in class today. First a quick video that shows opposing views on hacktivism:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wNXk6kLd8IA
Recent example of hacktivism: skittles.com
Since skittles.com has changed their site in the past days... here's a related article about what i orignally planned to talk about...
http://venturebeat.com/2009/03/01/skittles-tweet-the-rainbow-or-racial-slurs/
The gist of this is skittles.com is basing their site off social media... the background of their homepage is merely a twitter search (today it is a facebook fan page). What the execs at Mars Inc did not expect (or maybe they did), is the "hep" use of social media would result in a large amount of people spamming skittles.com, posting everything from racial slurs to toilet humor. It's pretty clear that the users of twitter and now facebook are sending a pretty clear message to the company... "you don't get it, you're trying to be cool, and therefore we're going to screw with you".
Also if you're interested in learning more about the different types of hacking, looks like there's a book out by Tim Jordan simply called Hacking. Check out this interview he recently did that gives a brief overview: http://ourmaninside.com/2009/02/27/hacking-and-hacktivism/
Sunday, March 1, 2009
I hope your weekend went well and you are ready to get back into the weekly grind. Well this is my first time blogging, ever. I came across this article in the New York Times, The Burden of Interactivity. I personally relate to this article; agreeing with the author that participating or being interactive with media can be scary and overwhelming. It is a cool comment on the process of the audience interacting with media, check it out and let me know your thoughts.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/magazine/11wwln-medium-t.html?_r=1
When it comes to virtual property the laws are not set in stone. Although material may develop via internet, to actually be eligible for copyright protection the material must be found in a fixed tangible medium as well as being original. A concern here is if the material is created and transmitted electronically should it be considered ‘fixed’. This also leads to the question if a document exits in physical space and is placed on the internet should it be protected for it is a second copy and not original.
All of this is confusing and I am looking foward to the furture to see what actual digital copywrite laws will or will not be put into place.